View Single Post
Old 07-15-2007, 10:31 AM   #20 (permalink)
warrrreagl
pinche vato
 
warrrreagl's Avatar
 
Location: backwater, Third World, land of cotton
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
This isn't a scam nor would it be considered fraudulent behaviour. As far as I know, Amazon lets you know how much shipping costs before you agree to pay. It would only be a scam if you didn't know what you were getting into. A company is able to set their prices as they see fit so long as they aren't breaking any laws. I don't see a lower price tag/higher order-processing variance as something deceptive. It is up to the consumer to shop around if they feel they are paying too much for something. To call it fraud is a bit far-fetched because it would mean this is illegal. As far as I know, Amazon's practices are well-known in terms of their pricing and shipping details. Wouldn't it be easy for someone to point out anything illegal? You might want to cross-reference this practice with laws in the U.S., but it sounds okay to me. It's how they do business. You see variances like this in other retail places. Consider the variances between service fees. Do cell phone companies all have similar hook-up fees, system access fees, cell phone price tags, and other service fees?
Speaking of phone companies, I just googled well over a million hits concerning class action suits against phone companies that collect all these extra "fees" and "taxes" and simply keep them as sheer profit. It's not ethical and it's not legal. Similarly, I have no concern over Amazon making a profit with item mark-ups, but I have a huge concern over Amazon making a profit off of fake shipping and handling charges. But the legality of all this is not my issue.

I'm seeing that we're having a huge translation problem over what's legal and what's right. I really don't care if they can legally get away with it or not - that's not my issue. Corporate defrauding of me as a consumer doesn't have to be illegal to raise my hackles. I'm trying to stay focused on what's wrong to consumers rather than what's legal in a courtroom.
__________________
Living is easy with eyes closed.
warrrreagl is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360