Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tecoyah
Having an unpopular, and perhaps blinded opinion is not reason to accuse someone of being influenced by bribery. While I too, am perplexed at the apparent visualization deficiency some individuals project,and even question the ability to think critically at times, asking someone if they are payed to ignore the obvious is a bit extreme.
Ace is welcome to his opinion, as is everyone else. That he might decide to look the other way when all information points to something other than that opinion is...more of a reason to continue showing him the facts, rather than alienate him further with pointless accusation.
|
I am sincerely attempting to discover how, in the face of everything that has happened....everything that I, and many others here have posted for ace to consider, that he could post this:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aceventura3
I bet less than 0.001% of the population could give you the exact details of conversations, emails, memos, who attended meetings, times and dates of same, etc. that occurred between 6 months and a year ago. Could you? And if you don't remember perfectly, isn't it safer to say you don't know?
|
Under the circumstances I just described, I wondered, in all seriousness, what could possibly be motivating ace to post as if he was an ........I can think of no other word for it...."apologist" for Bush, Cheney, and now...for Gonzales, and wondering whether he was....I thought that is was reasonable to ask if he was compensated to post....I'm sorry if it is not reasonable to ask, but there is a solid foundation for wondering if he is......