Quote:
|
Originally Posted by powerclown
Why shoot the messengers? These are political positions shared by many like-minded individuals. Wouldn't it be more substantive to critique the ideas they message - the other side of the coin, as it were? Can it be proved empirically and objectively that the Patriot Act is an unconstitutionally illegal encroachment on civil liberties, for example? Might there be any chance that overzealous criticism of FISA falls under what Judge Mills recently referred to as a "subjective fear of surveillance."
|
powerclown, I provided the DOJ IG's March 2007 report to prove that Goldberg's 2003 opinion was irrelevant. is it just coincidence that you haven't posted anything from a court filing....which is asserted as true and reliable by sworn affadavit or by the act of filing by an "officer of the court", i.e. an attorney admitted to the bar, and in good standing.....or from a finding by the DOJ inspector general, and that you've posted nothing to rebut the findings of official abuse of our rights and the lax regulations permitted under the Patriot Acts?
Post something that challenges what was confirmed by Bush's January 2006 admissions concerning his admitted authorizations to disregard FISA procedures and provisions, even though, twice in October 2001, he told us that the laws had been modernized to his satisfaction....and DOJ IG Glen Fine's March, 2007 report, <h3>instead of what you've been doing in you two recent posts here...posting now irrelevant opinions no newer than from 2004, of other conservatives.</h3>