Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aceventura3
Faith in the system would have involved the belief that there would be an investigation of a real crime and then bringing those responsible for that crime to trial. Fitzgerald failed in his responsibility. There was no crime, Libby's testimony was not material to his investigation of the alleged crime and Fitzgerald knew Libby's testimony was not material when he was entrapping Libby.....
|
....ace....that's bullshit...it's bullshit from some fringe, winged out opinion page, an IBD editorial...an "article" by Vicky Toensing, or a complaint to the OPR at DOJ about the conduct of special counsel Fitzgerald, by Clarice Feldman.....but what it is not,,,,is a reliable part of the record of the court proceedings or actial news reporting.
If we were to discuss what happened on 9/11 ace....what the government knew, and when it knew it..... would you accept at face balue, an opinion that contradicted a oublushed finding in the 9/11 Commission report?
If you attempted to post a persuasive argument that countered a 9/11 Commission oublished fining, wouldn't you need to post photos from an authenticated source and publication date....and the same would apply to a witness's opinion......
So, what is the basis of your opinion? I read quite a bit....and I've never read any news reporting from a non-Moonie, non-Murdoch, non-RNC, non-Bozell or Horowitz source, or from the court record, that ever supported the opinion that you just posted, ace.....
I've read bullshit on the ed and op-ed pages...even of the WaPo....but that isn't news, and it isn't from the court record....so why do you cite it.....
do you do it just to incite? Is it all you've got? Is that how you make up your mind? Do you ignore the news, ignore the record....and just react to the filtered bullshit printed on opinion pages?
Show us where you got that...... where it appeared in news reporting....not in a Novak column, or on some other page at townhall.com...... Have you wondered where you got that....how you could feel so persuafed by that "message", that you would repeat it as fact, in a post?