I'm not even questioning out of emotional reaction; I find her entire defense of her reasons to be hypocritical.
Freebirthing is reportedly to be an alternative to relying on the medical community, yet the ideology follows a doctor or two's theories.
Rhetoric about violence, sociopathic behaviors, compromised health and well being is being used in an attempt to boost the theory, but there's nothing to back the claims. In fact, saying that the most time spent after birth was with a child born by a C-section is in direct conflict of everything stated beforehand.
Quote:
|
In looking at demographics, sure someone like you may be tortured during a preemie experience and/or circumsized, or bottle fed and because of other factors, still be a healthy, contributing member of society.
|
Ironic that those that respond are told of their 'righteous indignation'....
Quote:
|
would suggest that traumatic birth and not bonding with momma for whatever reason could be the tipping point for a person into violence and crime. Conversely, someone who comes from all of that darkness in family life, who is born at home and perhaps even nursed and well bonded may still become a criminal because of the family situation.
|
Exactly. So why the constant insistence that those who are not of the same thought are in certain danger or raising sociopaths? As I stated, every point made to boost the reasons for freebirthing was worthless.