Reading your information Jenny, I'm sure you know and understand that correlation does not imply causation. I too find the sample size 14 to be laughable. I'd maybe agree that it has a little bearing say for a population of the country Iceland which is 300,000. But since we are talking about America, it is like me only polling my circle of friends and stating that it is factual and representative of the rest of the population.
Since I was a preemie, almost 2 months preemie, I'm prone to violence? I have been circumcised so I'm in double jeopardy to being prone to violence?
As far as the rape comment, what does that have to do with your argument? Push the emotion button to obfusicate the lack of logic that you have presented in some of your points? Tu quoque much?
Now based on your statements your kids #1,2,3,4 are all part of "Fifteen percent of U.S. children may enter life without such an attachment, feel no intimate, safe, and loving connection with anyone, posing high risk of violent behavior." So are they more violent than child #5?
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
|