First they may want to talk to victims of Bush's warrantless wire taps.
Second they may want to talk to those who carried out the orders of the Executive Branch.
Third they may want to bring in legal experts to define how the warrantless wire taps were an abuse of power.
Then the folks in the Executive Branch may want to present a defense of their actions.
Once you have that person testifying and on the record, I would think issueing a subpeonas would be easier to support once you have a specific basis for the subpeona.
Of course I am no expert, and there much be a logcal explanation of why Congress has not taken the approach above, what do you think the explanation is?
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."
|