Originally Posted by guy44

I don't mean to burst anyone's bubble, but whatever your politics, this "study" is basically bunk.

Here's why.




I don't see how anyone could credibly tout a study with a data set of only 144 journalists as being representative of anything whatsoever.


Quick update: Reconmike, I can tell you right now that the quickest way to get any liberal or Democrat to see red and ignore every single substantive point you could possibly make is to refer to the Democrats as the "Democrat Party." Everyone knows this is a code word for "I don't respect you enough to properly pronounce your name." It's like throwing in an ad hominem slur: it's rude, distracts from your arguments, and eradicates your credibility. I hope you'll refrain from doing this in the future.