I'd help you, but I have only used the feature once (just to see how bad it was).
It's entirely possible they removed it in 2007, because it's the most inefficient website generation I've EVER seen.
Quote:
What's wrong with Word?
Microsoft Word does a great job as a word processor, but it's not very useful for creating HTML documents that you can quickly plug into a Web site. When you a Word document as HTML, Word adds page- formatting tags that can make the document very large. These page-formatting tags may also cause content management programs and Web sites to behave unexpectedly.
[..]
Basically, the first 100 lines of the HTML file contained nothing but formatting information. Actual information didn't appear until line 93 of the file. This complete article, saved in Microsoft Word's default HTML format, consumed 18 KB of space. As you can see, it's both large and inefficient.
|
http://articles.techrepublic.com.com...1-5197013.html
You may want to research exporting into another format (txt or rtf) for conversion by another program to htm.