Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mixedmedia
Well my point about consistency pertains more to the acquisition of guns than the use and management of them. I think it would be ideal if someone living in a state with waiting periods who wants to buy a gun for "irresponsible" purposes weren't able to simply cross a state line and acquire one much easier. As I believe is the case now.
|
This thought is wrong. you cannot buy a handgun from out of state. What you CAN do, is say you found a good deal on a gun in virginia, but live in new mexico. What HAS to happen is that the seller ships the gun to a federally licensed dealer in new mexico, who then performs the NICS background check before you can pick up the gun.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by roachboy
.......
in general, i see in your position a dangerous alternative to the present order, one in which many of the worst features would be retained--not only that, but they would be transposed away from the political, into a hallucinated "natural order" and there would be no feedback loops that could address this because, well, there's no account made in your post of how such a system would work--only that democracy is bad.
that's a short version (believe it or not) os why i think your position problematic.
that said, though, thanks for taking the time to post an overview.
i'd be interested to see what you make of the response.
|
I started to try to read your post, but then got lost, as usual, because it makes no sense to me. I see a roller coaster logic to your debate that I can't keep up with. You call this jibberish, at least with dunedans basic layout, so I'll call yours jibberish.
You've edited the post since I started to respond and I see that you removed the 'redistribution of wealth' part. May I ask why?