Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosstbyte
This falls into that realm of "creative punishment." My gut reaction is that it's a shitty way for the police department to get something that they have no business having just because they could confiscate it from this guy. Should the guy be driving? Hell fucking no. Take his license, put him in jail, put his car in the garage, whatever. Don't parade it around like the spoils of war.
Just a few notes, the police officers knew they were doing something kind of lame and they're definitely playing with their new toy:
"When Marzetta dropped the man off at the county jail, he "thanked" him for the car."
and
"Marzetta drove the car -- a sleek, 450-horsepower billboard for the police department -- for the first time Thursday.
As he pulled out of the lot, he paused to rev the engine several times."
Basically now the police have something cool to joyride in instead of this guy joyriding in it. I don't really see why the police need this or why it serves any purpose in the DARE program (I'll save my feelings about the program itself for another place). The police are not here to plunder. They're here to protect and serve the community. Seizing assets and selling them is one thing. Confiscating someone's property for public use like that stinks.
|
As someone who has driven muscle cars for much of his life, I'll tell you that I agree with you for the most part. However, I also have to think that a $60k sports car seized from someone for felony evading is taken for a good reason. I've been pulled over for some extremely stupid acts, but not charged with felony evading. The guy kind of earned his medicine IMO.