Thread: Flight security
View Single Post
Old 06-14-2007, 11:22 AM   #12 (permalink)
snowy
Kick Ass Kunoichi
 
snowy's Avatar
 
Location: Oregon
One of the reasons I prefer to travel by train for shorter distances (like Eugene-Seattle, or Eugene-Vancouver, B.C.) is because of the lack of hassle. Furthermore, I trust those conductors to take control of the situation if something got out of hand--I've seen them haul drunk people off of the train (after Mariners and Seahawks games) several times. Sure, there is less security, and you can bring your own food on a train. But there's also a stop every so often at which point you can detrain passengers that might be questionable or threatening to those around them. You cannot stop a plane at 30,000 feet.

I would never take a train in the United States long-distance. I've been on several of the major long distance train routes in the U.S. already, and they're a wonderful way to see the country--but if you want to get somewhere on time, it's NOT the way to travel. However, their shorter corridor trains are handy and I take the train at least four or five times a year, if not more.

I really don't think airport security is that much of a hassle. But the airport in Portland tends to handle it well.
__________________
If I am not better, at least I am different. --Jean-Jacques Rousseau
snowy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73