Quote:
Originally Posted by FoolThemAll
This discussion is probably coming to a standstill, then, but just to reiterate: I don't see how the line could be crossed by the act of refusing something that is yours to give or to refuse.
|
Would you say that to a surgeon? "No brain surgery for you, you're black!"
That's not how services work. You sell, they have money. When McDonalds says no shoes no shirt no service, at least there's a sanitation consideration.
Would you support the pharmaceutical who refused to sell AIDS medication to gays? Would you support the electricity company who shuts off the power to all legal Mexican families?
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoolThemAll
I don't see any key difference between fining the bigot restaurant owner and fining the bigot grandpa who gives presents to all but the mixed-race grandchild. It's a terrible thing to do, and it's also none of the government's business.
|
It's about equal rights. All men are created equal. That's it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilbert1234567
denying is a passive action, if I don't offer Willravel service at my computer shop, that's not infringing on his rights, there are plenty of other places that will take his business, but if I hit Willravel with a rock and tell him to get out, that is wrong, that infringes on his rights. Conversely, if I worked at the DMV, and refused Willravel service, that would be wrong, the DMV is state owned, and the state can not discriminate.
|
...this is because of the 9/11 stuff, isn't it....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b1db/4b1dbe8296482d417ffaf27d0cffeb6921dbe2f8" alt="Expressionless"