View Single Post
Old 06-11-2007, 10:16 PM   #1 (permalink)
Halx
Please touch this.
 
Halx's Avatar
 
Owner/Admin
Location: Manhattan
Web Culture 2.0: The Stampede

Web Culture 2.0: The Stampede
By Andrew Gonsalves www.tfproject.org www.andrewgonsalves.com

You too can have your opinions heard on this network of nearly infinite reach. With not so much as a certification to your name, you can reach out. High tide has come and the flood of democratic internet participation has begun crashing through the levies and sandbag walls. And as the waters of free, unencumbered speech carry us into the streets where only experts once walked, we pierce the air with our battle cry. Web 2.0! Democracy will rule the internet!

We extol our wisdom, adding that we are not professionals, but we did stay at a Holiday Inn Express the previous night. We write with passion and conviction, only pausing to reference Wikipedia and our favorite blogs. Our voice is formed with the intent to pound our views into the heads of our audience, and all the while our audience is busy preparing a post of their own. Waiting your first missive is a list of links gleaned from thirteen of your opposition’s favorite message boards, citing opinions which corroborate their own; an undeniable truth.

That is Web 2.0 democracy: majority rules and debate is pretense for pageantry. Not only that, but the masses now control the truth. It is said that he who wins the war writes the book, and the traditional media is definitely not winning this one. With democratized content, users can erase the work of others that they disagree with. Corporations can white-out a black eye on their Wikipedia public record with a single keystroke. Entire representations of opinions can simply disappear on sites like Digg and Reddit, which give its users the power to make dissenting points of view vanish from consideration with a single click. The result is myopic tunnel vision, the perpetuation of unchecked conviction, and a cage match between back-patting and debate. In by the good graces of the predictable social media public, all associated with a favorite subject (both corporate and independent) are on the fast track to recognition with little check for sincerity or validity.

I’m glad I wasn’t the only one to notice the peculiar enthusiasm displayed by advocates of Adobe’s new beta release of a licensed product when it was given the spotlight on the first page of Digg. Nothing sat right with that one; from the infomercial-frankness of the praise, to the unanimous support for a product that costs $1300 for a single license, this front page article was a glistening beacon of fraudulent glory, sheltered by the good will of a democratic internet. Then there is viral marketing. In the works as I write this is a marketing campaign that is creeping toward fruition. My friend is conducting it by writing a blog for her client. Soon, there will be a shocking revelation and people will talk about it. This bit of exploitive information cuddles at night with the saying that there is no such thing as bad publicity. From their union, my friend’s client will glean momentary popularity and attention. And the consumers won’t know what hit them.

Corporate news entertainment has disenchanted us and driven us into the arms of independent, unchecked and volatile quasi-information pumped out in droves by blogs across the expanse of social media. The result is a loss of $4 billion off one corporation’s market cap because of an unchecked newsletter commenting on a bogus internal missive. The result is the loss of a primary election due to unverified claims of party infidelity. The result is a charmingly colloquial take on a situation we’re used to receiving with a modicum of professionalism.

The counter-argument to this all, as I see it, is that the alternative to this is centralized culture, which equates to soulless mainstream lowest common denominator content. Or we simply get more of the same highly streamlined information feeds with the influence of a single supervision. The decay of choice will be followed by the collapse of freedom, which is further compounded by the infliction of someone else’s will. We won’t have that, though. We will fight for our right to be mediocre in the face of art and culture. We will Digg that Paris Hilton story like there’s no tomorrow. We will ensure our roommate comes up first when you Google for “waste of sperm.” And it will be so.

DIGG
__________________
You have found this post informative.
-The Administrator
[Don't Feed The Animals]

Last edited by Halx; 06-12-2007 at 03:34 AM..
Halx is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360