Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ubertuber
Ah, but traitors are not always guilty of treason. In fact, they almost never are. I quite these easily verifiable facts from wikipedia:
I suppose I can conclude that you did not read the links I provided? |
uber, now, I have read the info at your provided links...(forgive this late and incomplete response; I've travelled to attend festivities...my stepson is sandwiching in his marriage between Afghan tours of duty, and my wife has pulled me temporarily away from TFP politics....)
You've done a great job of making your case that the thread title is dubious from a literal legal standpoint. I'll return soon to defend the idea that it still has merit, in spite of probably not rising to legal definition of "treason", or of "abetting", under US law....