Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
-snip-
I think I have an understanding of what the White House was trying to do the Plame and her husband.
I also think I have an understanding of what the prosecution of Libby is all about, given the fact that Fitzgerald knew who leaked Plames indentity and took no action agaist that person.
I also think I have an understanding of how after over 8 hours of questioning, anyone can find a basis for perjury against the most honest person in the world given this new standard.
I also think I have an understanding that the penalty for Libby's crime is not directly related to what he was charged with. Part of the penalty is punitive for what could not be proved in court.
To save some of you the effort, yes-I could be totally wrong, yes - my opinion, no - I have not listed 15 links and pages of quotes to support my views, yes-I have biases, yes - I have the nerve to question the judgement of the jury, the judge and fitzgerald, etc, etc,etc.
|
Ok then...so what your saying is you are aware of the administrations illegal tactics, but take issue with the way they are being prosecuted. Fair enough, and in fact I agree with you. It is indeed a pity no one has been charged yet with the actual crime in question.....but I don't think its quite over yet.
I think things are slowly catching up with Rove as well.