Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fastom
But MSD, are you just going to ignore the rest of the evidence and buy the official story at it's two-face value?
|
Some of us require actual evidence instead of wildassed theories being spread by mental patients calling themselves doctors.
Quote:
|
Concrete turning into fine powder on it's own is highly irregular. In a normal collapse that concrete would be broken into chunks and some large sections of the slabs would be held together by the rebar.
|
There is absolutely nothing normal about a 100+ story building being hit by a large jet full of fuel. There is even less normal about 2 100+ story buildings right next to each other being hit by two large jets full of fuel. You're looking at this highly abnormal method of building destruction and you're expecting it to behave like Lincoln logs being knocked down by a kid. What amazes me is that the heat was incredible, the forces involved with having the top half of the building hit the bottom half of the building at high speed, not to mention the structural damage potential of a nearly 150,000 pound object full of fuel slamming into it at hundreds of miles an hour, and yet people still think we have to have Star Wars weapons in order to bring the building down.
Quote:
|
The debris from building 7 is more like that... and what do you suppose happened to make that one collapse?
|
Gee, think your house might collapse if two 110 story buildings came down on top of it? Or would that also be caused by space lasers?
Quote:
|
So if you think a missile or bomb brought down Flight 93 it means you are disbelieving at least part of the official fable.
|
He doesn't think that. He's open to the possibility because the concept of an airplane being shot down by a missile isn't batshit crazy. The concept of some evil organization bringing down a building with space lasers and no one noticing is absolutely, uncompromisingly, insane.