Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aceventura3
One final attempt at communicating reality to you on coruption and cronyism. There is a level of coruption and croynism that exists in government, local, state and federal , these levels of coruption and croynism are not necessarily correlated with the amounts uncovered or brought to light. So you can pretend that the levels of corruption and croynism in the federal government changes based on who is in the White House, and if you do after 20 years in Washington, I would suggest taking another look at what is really happening.
|
I think I get it now, ace.
Am I to understand your point to view to be that Reagan, GWH Bush and Clinton had administrations that were or may have been as equally corrupt and unethical as G Bush...it was just not uncovered....even with more investigations of Clinton than any recent President?
Now that is a unique perspective, but it does enable you to hold the Bush administration less accountable for its actions than I do.
Its basically the old "they all did it" defense.
