no.
taltos
you missed the point of the thread, i'm afraid.
this is the OP
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tec
If there is anyone here with a deeper understanding on this issue, or some insight I may be missing, please help me answer a few questions. If by chance, ID becomes a standard subject in public schools, How can it possibly be taught without reverting to religious doctrine? And after the first few hours of explanation concerning this hypothesis.....what is left to discuss?
|
this is not about fucked up voting protocols, or whether kenneth miller can be president, or whether he voted to remove "some" restrictions on "some" material from the classroom. (and those are might big fucking 'some's, btw)
its about ID and how it might be taught in a classroom, what that would mean, and whether it makes sense. the article was used to anchor the point of the OP. i'm fine with discussing the election protocols of a school district in wherever the fuck this happened, but that's not the OP. if you concede that ID is invalid scientific concept with no basis in verifiable scientific reality, i guess we can ask
tec if he wants to move the thread to focusing on this one guy up in wtfth.
edit goddamn it
roach. quit beating me to the punch.
and i see you've already full force moved to the second point of discussion, and answered it too. fuck fuck fuckedy fuck fuck fuck. yeah, if some science-dowser wanted to head up my local school board, i'd try to get him out too.
'oh well, he's the guy on a technicality. guess i'll tell johnny to catch up on his snake handlin'. yes son, dinosaurs
ARE god's way of testing your faith. i'm so glad you learned that in school today.'