|
I don't think we can cherry-pick who is human and who isn't based on one's actions. Ted Bundy was human. He was an extremely miserable human, but a human nonetheless. A human being is certainly capable of doing what he did, just as a human being is capable of doing what Leonardo da Vinci did. We as a society like to trick ourselves into thinking that the most terrible things are beyond us--that we are incapable of such things--therefore they must be inhuman things.
Moreover, I do not believe we can pinpoint the boundaries of humanity by measuring the "authenticity" of our bodies, externally or internally. Our humanity doesn't reside in our brain. Knowing our bodies are temporary, why place the stock of our humanity in it? I think there is more to it than this. We gauge humanity not by our physical dimensions but by our actions and experiences, both good and evil. It is for this reason that we are still moved by both Ted Bundy and Leonardo da Vinci.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön
Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
|