Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rekna
Laws that may have or have been broken:
1) Using RNC accounts for official email
|
Has this been proven yet? And if so, what is the point. To me it is like saying they used UPS rather than FEDEX if there was a regulation to use FEDEX. Who cares? What is it that they really want to know? They want to know if Bush, Rove or Chaney told Gonzales to fire people. If they did, they had a right to do so. In-fact almost everyone already knows Gonzales would not have made such a move without Bush's o.k. Now gonzales is covering for the White House. Do we need a federal investigation to know that? And now that we all know it, so what? It is not illegal to fire these folks.
Quote:
|
2) Interfering with official investigations
|
Which investigations? How have they interfered? Congress has been on fishing expeditions, looking for something, anything, wasting time and resources and not focusing on real issues.
Quote:
|
3) Falsifying evidence to create propaganda to lead us to war
|
Did they falsify evidence or "cherry-pick" the evidence to support their case? One would be criminal in my view the other not.
The administration certainly had enough evidence to support a case for war using information that was common knowledge. Actually most who supported the war - supported it based on that information, including Sen. Clinton.
Quote:
|
4) Falsifying evidence to continue to create support for the way (aka more propaganda, examples: lynch, tillman).
|
Was this the Bush administration or the military? The way I understood the Tillman situation was that military officers at the location at the time and on the scene tried to cover-up the truth from the very begining, do you think the Bush administration was involved in that? Is there proof?
I don't know anything about the Lynch controversy.
If you refer to Libby, that is debatable in my view. If you are talking about Gonzales, if they have proof, they should move forward with perjury charges.
Generally, all I have seen are "perjury traps", oh wait, no one in Congress would ever set someone up for that.
Quote:
|
6) Warrentless wiretapping
|
That has not been tested in court. The administration obtained legal opinions and selected members of Congress were aware of what the administration was doing. Has any victims of thes illegal wiretaps come forward and is willing to show how their rights were infringed upon?
Quote:
7) Failing to uphold the constitution
|
I don't get that one.
Quote:
|
8) Funding terrorists in Iraq (look at the way we handed out money and you will see much of it ended up in our enemies hands)
|
The nature of war can be strange and often not understood, however, to suggest the administration is funding terrorist against our national interest and public saftey especially during war is to suggest they are guilty of treason. If this charge is true, people should be hung. Would you be willing to hang people now and in the future on the kind of evidence you have supporting your allegation?
Quote:
|
9) Outing an undercover CIA official for political gain
|
Why didn't the special investigator bring that charge against anyone?
Quote:
I'm sure there are a bunch I missed. Ohh yeah here is one more....
10) Eating babies (this has to be a hobby of Karl Rove  )
|
Why are people on the left so obsessed with Rove?