Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
What is the Democratic Party's case for continued funding of the war, even to July? I don't get the distinction between thinking the war was a mistake, poorly managed, lost - and, the desire to put more money into what they and many others think is a hopeless cause.
|
As a liberal with friends in Iraq, I don't want them to be underfunded while they're at war. The idea is to cut funding to get them home, but what if the bluff is called? What if they insist on keeping them in Iraq despite a cut in funding? That's a massive risk with our troops safety. That is where the divide in the liberal strategy lies. We want to end the war, but we also recognize the amazing sacrifice of our troops and we want them to be safe.
The best way to end the war is to push decent legislation about ending the war through the Senate and to get BIG support. The idea is to bypass the veto-machine in the oval office.