I think that part of the issue is clearly that not everyone makes their minds up in the same way. Here on TFP, lots of people sat around and told each other that, after examining the evidence, there was no way that voters would endorse G.W. Bush again. Obviously that was incorrect. Diebold scandals or no, a lot of people voted for Bush.
I agree that this is a good place to have unflinching facts easy at hand and for us to expose misinformation. However, I also think that if you want to change the world, you'll have to address some of these people on the level that they're making decisions, not on on the level that you are.
The political voice here is in agreement so often because it has run others off or excluded them, not because it has won them over. That's not helping anyone "win the fight".
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam
|