Ace, I have read others challenging your "proofs" as mere cherry picking, but I've seen it for myself with this bit:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aceventura3
I went to Kucinich's websit and read on of the documents used to support his case. Here is what Chaney said about Al Qeada
http://kucinich.house.gov/UploadedFiles/artI1A.pdf
"Well, I sense that some people want to believe that there is only one issue that I ‘m concerned about. And/or that somehow, I am out here to organize a military adventure with respect to Iraq; that’s not true. The fact is, we are concerned about Iraq, that’s one of many issues we’re concerned about. But in all of the stops that I’ve made so far, we’ve talked not only about the war on terror, which is, in many respects, more imminent, ongoing current activity. We talked about the importance of our continued efforts in Afghanistan as well as making certain that the Al Qaeda doesn’t relocate to any other country in the region" |
Quote:
|
There is a clear seperation between Al Qeada and Iraq, I am not sure how the above supports the impeachment, I need some help with it.
|
Ace, you plucked one paragraph from a six page interview (Cheney in Bahrain, 2002) that was just one among the 16 citings you had to choose from. I believe this form of debate to be fundamentally dishonest, and I now understand why your positions have lost credence in this forum.
Anyone interested in a full presentation of Kucinich's articles of impeachment should use the following link:
http://kucinich.house.gov/SpotlightIssues/documents.htm