Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shakran
The differences between the sexes are largely culturally influenced. We give the little girl a dolly and a stroller to play with. We give the boy a hammer and a cap gun.
The real difference between men and women is in large part caused by societal pressures, and therefore your question must be called into (cough) question.
|
Independent of the position outlined in the OP (which seems to be an unsubstantiated claim about differences between the sexes), whether or not there are innate psychological differences between men and women is an empirical question. It is not established fact that differences are largely culturally influenced. Far, from it. There is a massive amount of research examining differences between men and women that don't appear to be culturally influenced. I'm hesitant to go into it because the evidence is overwhelming. Some sources you might consider:
Individual differences research by Benbow and Lubinski
Cognitive neuroscience research by Doreen Kimura
Individual differences research by David C. Geary
Cortical adrenal hyperplasia research
John Money's irresponsible attempts to change the genders of individuals following botched circumsions
5-alpa reductase deficiency research
Ethology research
Robert Trivers' research
David Buss's research
Steve Gangestad's research
Non-human primatology research
Theoretical biology research
Evolutionary biology research
I could go on and on, but from my perspective, providing evidence of innate differences between men and women is like arguing that the earth is round, not flat or that the sun is the center of our solar system, not the earth.
Sex differences in cognition are likely produced by an interaction of innate mechanisms with specific environmental input. I think that it's important to identify precisely how our psychologies develop and work. Simply saying that society, or socialization, or even human nature is responsible is incomplete.
Quote:
|
Especially since we can all think of examples we know personally that reverse the "laws" for want of a better term that you put forth in your argument.
|
Any research findings on groups doesn't necessarily apply to every individual. Thinking of examples that reverse the"laws" is akin to arguing that penicillin doesn't work for everyone. So, it must not be an antibiotic.