Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aceventura3
So your position is that "it" is a one sided thing. O.k., and you talk about wanting a serious discussion?
The readers of this exchange can determine who has been more objective. We have gotten off topic here and I am not sure I can add any value to Host's other thread.
|
ace....read what I wrote....
"Recent history suggests it goes more one way than the other". That does not imply a "one-sided thing", rather it suggests a "tilt" to the right with more Repub abuses and excesses than Dems when it comes to recent Congressional oversight by a majority party of a Pres of the opposing party.
And the facts bear me out if you take the time to look objectively.
Or post your own facts to make the case (as I asked) that Dem revenge against Reagan or GHW Bush was anything near the level of the Repub Congress "grandstanding" and "milking" of Clinton...and you can even include Dem hearings on Reagan-Iran/Contral and GHW Bush-BCCI/Iraqgate (illegal funding of arms to Iraq)...both having far more serious national policy implications that Clinton's affair.
Absolutely, let the readers determine for themselves if "it" is equally balanced or tilts more one way that the other....and if anyone cares to share facts that back up their opinion, I will be happy to discuss it further in a new thread so as not to get further off track from Gonzales.
