trickyy

this is what i originally thought before i started looking at the details. then i heard gonzales testify on Thursday and he removed all doubt that there are very serious problems.

gonzales could/should have easily explained the situation. i agreed with the people who said we should "hear him out"

but his convenient "forgetfulness" when confronted with questionable emails, memos, meeting information, etc., combined with several "misstatements" and overall poor management skills should be of concern to anyone with resonable standards for the notion of Justice (rememeber that is what he is supposed to represent).

if this issue not a big deal, why does he obviously have something to hide? it seems as though he twists the truth when convenient ("I don't recall...") ... is a person lacking honesty someone we want leading the primary department of Law and Order in the country? or would you call him an honest man?