View Single Post
Old 04-21-2007, 03:44 PM   #46 (permalink)
host
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by reconmike
The only difference is that these attorneys were fired because they didn't tow the president's agenda, there is nothing wrong or illegal with doing that.

If the president wants illegal immigration or the death penalty prosectuted
by HIS US attorney and he does't get it, then it is within his right to fire them.
reconmike....can you come up with a serious question to ask General Gonzales?
You impress me as being a patriotic American.....but I posted detailed accounts of multiple incidents.....irrefutable evidence (you didn't....haven't ever refuted it....) that both the POTUS and the VP lied over and over.....since late 2002....Bush as recently as last Sept....and Cheney as recently as this month.....that Saddam's relationship with al Q'aida....and specifically with al Zarqawi....was justification for invading and occupying Iraq. I've showed that they both lied about that....and I posted on this thread the exchange between Gonzales and Sen. Schumer concerning the fact that US Attorney Carol Lam was fired without ever being told by anyone at DOJ what her performance deficiencies were.....

Cqrol Lam prosecuted Randy Cunningham and she brought indictments qgainst CIA's #3 Dusty Foggo and his best friend and Cunningham briber Wilkes and cobriber Mitchell Wade. Cqrol Lam was...when she was fired.....investigating Jerry Lewis...the chairman of the congressional committee dealing with defense appropriations that Randy Cunningham served on.....when he was indicted.....details are here:
www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/cats/jerry_lewis/

mike....so far....you've reacted by posting a scroll joke concerning the length of my last post....but no comment about it's damning material about the two leaders who I presume you defend in your last post.....

I ask you and Gonzales the same question now.....was Cunningham acting like a traitor in a time of war? Why was it more important to impede Carol Lam's investigation of the full extent of the crimes of those associated with Cunningham's crimes...?.
host is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360