Quote:
Originally Posted by rekna
By your logic it is easy to buy drugs illegally so we should just legalize them. Or it's easy to find child pornography so we should just legalize it.
|
I take SEVERE offence in THAT type of comment. You are trying to use a rediculous theory to try and support your own claim. My logic has NOTHING to do with drugs or child pornography...and I would appreciate it if you wound not try and make THAT type of infrance in what I am trying to say!
And no. your infrance does NOT still stand. A child CHOOSING to drink and risk themselves has NOTHING to do with a person whose SOLE INTENT was to kill people. The teenage drinker, or drug user is NOT going out with the INTENT to try and kill someone else, in a mass production way. I am in NO WAY saying that we shouldn't try to do something to prevent crime. What I AM saying, is that there really is no way to totally prevent all crimes. I am simply stating that trying to take guns away from everyone is a flawed concept in THIS country.
Back to the weapon specific disussion: I have read your posts about "fingerprinting" a gun when purchasing. Did you know that I can fire less than 200 rounds through a pistol, and change the "fingerprint" so to speak by the 200th round? The rifling of a barrel can change over time. The way they get a match in the riffling is usually due to a limited number of rounds fired after the one that is being investigated. So fingerprinting a barrel would really be insignificant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Have you ever shot a criminal?
|
Unfortunately, yes I have.
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
I don't believe in mental health privacy. Just like you can have a driver's license when you're blind, you shouldn't be able to get a gun if you're unstable.
|
I also do not agree in privacy, but only when OFFICIAL needs are there. I do feel that if I go to a doctor because I am feeling depressed, that my neighbor or coworker have no right to know this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
He'd probably see a dentist, as to avoid further splinters in the gums
|
A little selfless plug there eh?...
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Well it wouldn't just be in case the government lost it. It would also come in handy if we were invaded.
They could keep the weapons at home, locked up.
|
OK, then you SUPPORT the right to keep arms in the home?
Again, I am honoured to have debates with you Willravel!