OK, so now I'm getting a sense of when you went to law school.
hmm, but where would you place Bork then (if different)?
Or how would you rework the partial typology I posted of restraintive positions?
AKAIK, interprativist and textualist are not distinct...the former is an earlier designation?
Whether you or I like the phrase "strict constructionism" is neither here nor there. I've defined it and am not carrying any political baggage with it. I do not see anything in dksuddeth's position that allow anything other than a literal reading of the words written. He even explicitly differentiated himself from Scalia...