Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Your point is that guns wouldn't have helped them? I wasn't aware that you'd joined my side of the gun debate. Welcome.  |
Not hardly, but you know this. Those three categories were those that were DENIED the ability to have a gun, not that it wouldn't help them.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
They're dead, so they don't give a damn about anything anymore.
|
So we don't give a crap about dead people anymore, got it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Or one could simply stay home from school. More guns would have meant more flying bullets. More flying bullets could have very easily meant more fatalities. There's absolutely no guarantee that if some vigilante had a gun he or she could have stopped the gunman. The fact of the matter is that they weren't allowed to have guns to avoid just such an occasion. Had security done it's job, this might have been a much different story.
|
yeah, I can just imagine that if one student had a gun and fired back, the death toll would be at 50 or 60 instead of just 32.
why would the cops carry a gun then if flying bullets just mean more dead people?