Quote:
Originally Posted by Deltona Couple
I am curious. Why would you recommend reading lotr BEFORE the hobbit? I feel the hobbit is what introduced us to Middle Earth, and set the basis for lotr. Or am I missing something?
|
Not that I can speak for Charlatan, but I look at LoTR as the real story. The Hobbit is sort of an easy reading prologue to LoTR. It gets you into it, as a first chapter would, but isn't really the meat or point of the story; all that comes later, in LoTR. Is it weird to say I like the prologue more than the actual story?