Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Maybe that justice can explain where in:
|
Will, he is not saying that the right is IN the 5th, he is saying that one cannot be denied without due process of law, according to the 5th.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
...anything is said about interstate travel. I see grand jury, war trials, double jeopardy, self incrimination, due process, and eminent domain. As smooth stated, there is no explicitly stated constitutional right to travel within the country. If anything, the 10th Amendment might come into play (as nothing is specifically restricted in the Constitution), but that's a rather weak argument when one insists that free travel is constitutionally protected.
|
so what you're saying is that UNLESS a right is specifically enumerated in the constitution or the bill of rights, that it does not exist? How Alberto Gonzalez like of you.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|