If Bush lied, then everyone before him lied, and the UN lied and all the Security Council members lied including the Russians who had their own intelligence. I guess all the UN resolutions regarding Iraq were lies too. You focus on WMD's because it turned out to be wrong, but that wasn't the only reason given. How about the No-Fly Zone, 13 previous UN resolutions ignored, financial support for terrorist families, purchase of weapons from France, Germany and Russia, and the Oil for Food scandal? President Clinton and everyone below him made statements that support the belief that WMDs existed or were in development. How much more do you need? Let's face it, you would not support a war under any circumstances. Bush nor any other president could ever be right enough. Liberal let Slick Willy slide on everything he ever did in office, but he was their guy right? I hope you give some thought to what the troops over there think, and not what you want. Right, wrong or indifferent.....no war should ever be lost purposely. The troops say they can win, the general says the surge is working and we need to support this until we win. 3500 dead soldiers and 30,000 wounded compared to all other wars is less then a battle, it is insignificant as a statistic of war. Is it unfortunate when someone (anyone) is killed whether innocent or doing their duty.....of course! The only "weak ass arguments", as someone stated, are the excuses given for not winning this war. My apologies for any personal attacks earlier.
|