Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pigglet
nope - i'm just not fully comfortable chipping my pets. black helicopters and tinfoil hats, etc.
|
agreed...........pretty soon it'll be us getting fuckin' chips.
my dogs are both tattoed.........like it that way.
not really even worried about them even if they do get out.
the few times it has occured,they've come right back with a good loud whistle.
that being said........if people are comfortable with the chip,do it.
it's your choice right?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by *Nikki*
I think that pet's that won't wear a collar should all be chipped, unless of course they are strictly indoors or have no chance/desire to escape.
|
my dogs are strictley outside dogs.
they have thier jobs to do.......
and neither of them wear collars anymore,because of the playtime fights,they just end up ripping them off of each other.
the collars go on for walks only.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pigglet
jorgelito,
i don't want to speak for others, but i personally do not want to participate in what i essentially consider to be field research and free animal testing for a technology that could potentially be used on humans. that is not to say that the human application is the primary target for all the people involved in pet chipping, on either the user side or the supplier / vet side. on the contrary, i think most of these people, like the people posting in this thread, are good people who only want to protect their pets. however, i do think that it might help pave the way for commercial human implantation / ex-convict monitoring / immigrant monitoring, and would simultaneously provide a large body of well-documented research showing the efficacy of the procedures, as well as having addressed many of the major health and safety issues associated with this technology.
|
dude!!!!
well said man.
