|
damn it, this is getting tired. i'm sorry, i know that's not a very articulate positon, but for fuck's sake. her 'covert' status isn't up for contention. its a fact. she was 'covert' previously, when she worked for brewster-jennings. afterwards, she publicly took a desk jockey job with the cia; a natural move for someone with her public experience. this isn't simple shit, and they don't play cookie cutter roles. my guess on the first couple of your questions, ace is that that story was so huge that it made little difference. her contacts would have been compromised based on a rumor half that large. i don't think they wear groucho marx fake moustache glasses with an assumed identity; that's why its so dangerous. your background holds up to scrutiny because you really earned your degrees and so forth. you're a real person the government reaches out to in order to conduct espionage.
i personally hope they hold these guys to the fire on this one. i think its pretty obvious that scooter's the fall guy; but i can't feel too badly for him. he knew the game he was playing. i wonder if the precedent that may be set in the doj / executive privelage / advisory testimony could have any affect on follow ups to this.
__________________
You don't love me, you just love my piggy style
|