Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aceventura3
I looked at the video. The exchange speaks for itself, and I don't think my post took the quote out of context. The fact of the matter is that she was not told that she was covert meeting the definition of the law and she seemed to think it would take a lawyer to answer the question.
Pssst! Guess what - nobody told me but I am a covert agent for the CIA. I am so covert the CIA doesn't even know I work for the CIA. I have been under cover overseas. I think the thread count was about 500. 
How can I take Plame serious when see poses on the cover of a national magazine? I don't think covert agents would do that. I still think this is now a joke.
http://www.jimgilliam.com/images/vf_wilson_plame.jpg |
IMO, the "joke" is that you continue to repeat conservative "spin" that is completely opposite the position that the politicians in the executive branch, and at the CIA, and that special counsel, Patrick Fitzgerald, has sworn to in court filings, both in the federal circuit court of appeals, and in federal court.
You "carry water" for deluded, extremely partisan pundits, bloggers, and republican PR "operatives" (examples... Victoria Toensing and her close, personal friend, Bob Novak....) in an effort to downplay the effects on moral and recruiting at vital agencies, during "a time of war", such as the CIA, DIA, etc....of the intentional leaking to the press, by high officials in the executive branch, of the classified details of a CIA employee who worked for a CIA "front" company, engaged in WMD counter-proliferation operations....
Why do you make the effort to do this ace....aren't you undermining "our troops", and giving those who violated their security clearances for political revenge, a "pass" that is akin to voicing your support for their crimes?
If you disagree with my points here, can you provide a quote from any high level, executive branch official, denying that Valerie Plame's CIA employment status was classified information? That would seem a required, and not too difficult, initial step in support of your oft posted argument.....if it is an accurate one, that is.....