|
Just in case you've got me in the wrong camp will, as I stated at the outset, I'm just trying to systematically eliminate both proofs and criticisms of God's existence. Will Ravel For Food, you seem to have a fairly firm grasp on at least the basics of theology. You’re kind of stuck on the concept of organised religions though, and critiquing them instead of critiquing the possibility of God is like shooting fish in a tabernacle. You also might have overlooked Buddhism when commenting about a passive God. But you’ve yet to make any commit any outrageous fallacies, and you’re at least sparking some good debate. I think a lot more damage could be done if you gave defending God’s existence a try, and we had another contender or two meet us at every step. I guess what I’m saying is…
“Join me, and I will complete your training. With our combined strength, we can end this destructive conflict and bring order to the galaxy.”
(And no, you don’t have to believe that what you’re arguing is true. Take Ron Hubbard for example…)
|