I think the biggest news in the story is that the court of appeals recognizes the second ammendment as an individual right ,not just that of a militia... the basis for a large part of the anti-gun argument. I was also shocked to see the dissenting judge saying that the constitution does not apply in D.C. because it is not a state? Which part of the constitution do you not want to apply? That could be pretty ugly if carried out to the extreme.
__________________
"Iron rusts with disuse, stagnant water loses its purity and in cold water freezes. Even so does inaction sap the vigor of the mind"
Leonardo Da Vinci
Last edited by nofnway; 03-10-2007 at 05:53 PM..
|