how could they ask the wrong question, the answer they got was that the controller had to traverse a flight of stairs to see the radar vs transponder view. thats a pretty big stretch there.
there articles are written by professionals, technical writers, thats why they read like they were written by professionals technical writers. technical writers write technically so they can't be misinterpreted. why would you lump them in with lawyers unless you want to bring in the negative connotation that lawyers have. now you are not just attacking the books credibility but the organization as a whole, you are attacking a credible, accurate organization with a great track record of accuracy because they don't agree with some guy you know. you have an agenda, to only accept the evidence that supports your views while rejecting anything that disagrees with them.
__________________
Donate Blood!
"Love is not finding the perfect person, but learning to see an imperfect person perfectly." -Sam Keen
|