Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rekna
If you don't believe he lied on a material matter then the burden of proof is on you as there is overwhelming evidence to suggest he did, enough to say that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
I have no burden to prove anything. Based on the limitied information I have, I formed an opinion. That is all it is. Why are you guys trying to make my opinion something other that what it is, and what I have stated is limited information.
However, I do question the logic being used by you and others. Faulty logic begs to be questioned. I am not trying to be offensive, but it seems that one's political views determine how one sees this issue. It seems true on both sides. Why would it be outside of the realm of possibility that the whole trial was politically motivated?
And, it seems your responce to the questions in post#24 would be to ignore the questions and not cooperate.