|
hey dave,
i guess for me, i don't understand why you interpret these instances of personal proof (flowers blooming, bees a-buzzing, cocks a crowing, etc) with proof of a particular flavor of religion, or even the presence of any sort of personified anthromorphic deity. i understand where i think you're coming from, and i definitely get the sensation that there is more occurring in this world / universe than contained in our theories. in fact, i think that inherent. but i don't see any particular facet that says "yes, my intepretation is correct." i can even somewhat understand a perspective from any particular believer that says "this is my perspective, and its only my perspective. it may have some flaws, maybe its not the "truth." but it works for me, and so forth." what i don't understand is the dogmatic belief that any particular religion is "correct."
but hey, it is a gorgeous day outside and i'm off to take a run.
__________________
You don't love me, you just love my piggy style
|