Quote:
Originally Posted by pornclerk
Yes that is true. I would be more concerned about the diamond if it were the centre stone, but in this case it's an aquamarine. Actually $1600 isn't that bad compared to some other stuff I've seen. There was a band I was ready to buy that had 1/3 carat of diamonds in the band and it was almost $2000. This one has more and they are of better quality too.
I don't think $1600 for an engagement ring is that bad. What do you guys think?
|
without seeing that other band you're referring to, it's hard to comment. but a larger diamond will cost more than two or more diamonds of an equal or greater total weight.
so if the other ring had two or twenty diamonds that equaled 1/3 carats, that will have more value and appreciation (both economically and aesthetically) than 40 diamonds totalling .44 carats. you're also comparing clarity and*
if it's a matter of whether we like it, yes, it's a pretty ring. and if you love it, and it speaks to you, then my opinion should have little relevance. but if it's a question of value, I don't think you're getting a "deal."
I think you could print that out and go to a number of reputable local stores and see what they can do for you. and if you have to pay a couple hundred extra to make sure it sparkles the way you want, then that would be worth it.
I don't think there is anything inherently wrong with paying $1500+ for an engagement ring. but you might want to look at how it will line up with your marriage band before plunking down that amount.
EDIT: *this got cut out, comparing clarity, color, and size, but you need to also consider cut. and cut, since the stone is already set, can't really be assessed without looking at the ring. It will have noticeable effect on the brilliance and sparkle (wow factor) of the ring.