View Single Post
Old 03-04-2007, 07:34 PM   #26 (permalink)
AVoiceOfReason
Psycho
 
Location: Greenwood, Arkansas
Quote:
There is also a division of new world creationists, ones who say scientists are full of crap and the other who says that the scientists are right, but the earth is still only 6000 years old. The earth was just made to look older (rewind to science's picture of the earth 6000 years ago and that is how God made it).
I'm in the camp that say scientists that go into a field with a predetermined outcome can find something to support that outcome, even if it means using faulty methods of getting there. Take radiometric dating, for example. There are several assumptions one has to make in testing a rock to get an age. One must assume the beginning condition is known. There is an assumption of the ratio of the daughter to the natural state. A constant decay rate must be assumed. There must no leaching or addition of parent or daughter during the intervening time, but it isn't possible to KNOW this, so it must be assumed. Finally, all previous assumptions must be valid for billions of years.

Yet, even with all the variables that must be subjectively plugged into the equation, those that are looking for an answer that yields an old earth cling to such dating as though it yields real answers instead of the theory it gives.

I believe in God and the Genesis account. That, however, is a theological belief. I recognize the difference between faith and fact. And the fact is, neither evolution (which requires an old earth) nor creationism can be scientifically proven--both are models of what one believes happened or had to have happened. When I compare the facts we do know--the fossil record, the geological column, the laws of thermodynamics, the amount of uranium accumulation in the ocean, the amount of pressure in oil reservoirs, the number of humans on the earth, the amount of sediment on the ocean floors, etc.---I am convinced that what we are seeing is more in tune with a young earth rather than an old one.

And a young earth can only come about through the work of a Creator. I'm aware there are some creationists that try to straddle the fence--accepting some of the theories of those that must be true in order to accommodate an old earth and agreeing that the earth must be billions of years old, but I'm not one of them. I cheerfully affirm that God could have done it that way had He chosen to do so--but it's not consistent with the evidence I've studied.
__________________
AVOR

A Voice Of Reason, not necessarily the ONLY one.
AVoiceOfReason is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360