|
It's silly posturing. The so-called ban has no real effect; according to the article, it's basically just the New York City council saying that using the word "nigger" is bad.
Well, obviously, in general, it is.
However, it's a bit more complex than that. When "nigger" is used as an affectionate form of address between two black people, it takes on a different connotation than it does when used by a non-black directed at black people. In much the same way, I'll sometimes refer to my wife and I as "dykes" or "queer," even though those are both pejoratives when used to describe lesbians or gays by others.
Whatever means of communication a subculture chooses within that culture is fine with me. Black guys can call each other "nigger" all they like. Gay guys can call each other "faggot" all they like. It becomes problematic when it's used outside that subculture, either by members of the subculture itself, or by others in reference to members of the subculture. The first is rude, the second openly offensive, and in the wrong situation, dangerous. I'd never use such language in class, around neighbors or their kids, nor do I permit it from my students in class or in papers except in very limited circumstances.
I'm mixed on the effect of frequent usage in music, but I don't think it's the government's place to interfere with free expression.
__________________
I'm against ending blackness. I believe that everyone has a right to be black, it's a choice, and I support that.
~Steven Colbert
|