Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
kinda long, roachboy....get with it and use the hide= tags....
The "political will" references in the articles that you posted, are a "set up" for what is already happening......and I've seen the same tired ole "movie", before.
.....but...I'm much too partisan....and unapologetic....because, after all, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Too bad "facts based" can't come before "opinion".....
|
Host this post had me laughing my as off, "fact based" coming from a op-ed piece on a site called anonymousliberal.com, holy crap I think I just pissed myself.
At the moment I am doing research on a site called girlymenwanttogiveterroristshugs.org I'm looking for a good op-ed piece there to prove my opinion with facts.
Now back to the original topic:
In war there are always several strategy changes, it changes according to what is happening on the ground.
I hope whatever strategy General David Petraeus attempts it works this time,
because we can not afford to lose this war for numerous reasons.
The main one being that we can not have our enemies thinking that the American public can dictate how the military fights its wars.
As for GW's ability to consider the possibility of using neighboring countries to try and help stabilize Iraq he should be applauded instead of being chastised
for it.
Is this not what all you left leaners want? Let us talk with these people!!!! Diplomacy!!!! Hugs before guns!!!!!
And when it occurs it gets spun badly also by you people.
Why is it that the left wants the US to lose this war so badly?
It is not like that there are too many leftys that fight in any war, so it is not like you are losing alot of your voting base, on the contrary republicans are being killed in Iraq, while your base is waitng for that monthly government teat to roll in.