View Single Post
Old 05-30-2003, 06:48 AM   #50 (permalink)
ganon
Insane
 
ganon's Avatar
 
Location: in my head
excuse my humor, those who were offended. I often try to be funny, for funnys sake, with no animosity intended. In the great depression, the economy continued to fail because of deflation, and the deflation continued because hoover insisted on having a balanced budget. Because he would not budge on that, the gov could not affect the flow of money. when nixon took us off of the gold standard in the 70's, that gave the gov the freedom to grow and retard the amount of currency in circulation. It is an accepted theory of keynesian economics that gov's cannot run correctly without a deficit. combining these things allows the gov to actually steer the economy, but not totally control it. the idea behind deficit spending is to give people more of their money so that they will either invest or spend, allowing more capital to be available, or increasing economic activity that will create jobs,(supply and demand) and increase the base of taxable income in the long run. the trick is to control inflation. as long as the gov doesn't increase the available money for economic activity by actually printing more money, then inflation will not increase. by allowing people to simply spend the money they make, more money circulates thru the economy. then the gov revenue grows out of the deficit, and jobs are created. when you get down to it, most people want to be able to pay the cable, drive a decent car, cover the mortgage and want to go out to dinner now and then. because the usa is primarily a service economy, the only way to stimulate the economy is by giving people more money to spend on services. i would rather have a trustworthy (financially) gov in a deficit situation and know that my job is more secure, because the economy is growing or at least humming along, than not have the deficit, and know that my job is tenable. I won't spend any money if i am trying to stockpile against possible job loss. less money moving, less money for people to get what they want. as for tax cuts for the rich, you can only give tax money back to the people who actually pay them. 96% of the income taxes in america are payed by 50% of the taxpayer base. that means a lot of people out there aren't paying taxes (fica type) anyhow. If a rich person gets a tax cut, who am I to bitch, it isn't my money to begin with. the mindset that I should have any say about anyone elses (personal) money is the whole problem in this country. i have found that a lot of wealthy people spend a buttload of money on things that stimulate the economy. works for me.
__________________
"My give up, my give up." - Jar Jar Binks
ganon is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360