View Single Post
Old 02-24-2007, 01:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
ubertuber
spudly
 
ubertuber's Avatar
 
Location: Ellay
Have the Dems learned from the Republicans only too well?

Washington Post: Democrats Offer Up Chairmen for Donors
Quote:
Full article text   click to show 

Eager to shore up their fragile House and Senate majorities, congressional Democrats have enlisted their committee chairmen in an early blitz to bring millions of dollars into the party's coffers, culminating in a late-March event featuring House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and 10 of the powerful panel chairs...

"Financial services companies are inclined to give to me because I'm chairman of the committee important to their interests," said Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, who will headline a breakfast Wednesday at a D.C. hotel, for which donations range from $1,000 to $15,000 for the Democratic National Committee...Asked whether banking interests feel obligated to give to Democrats when he asks them for contributions, Frank answered: "Obligated? No. Incentivized? Yes." Frank said, however, that those donating "understand, and others do, too, that there are no guarantees of my doing what they want, or even my being pleasant."

Financial interests will have several opportunities in the coming weeks to make contributions and attend events that will put them close to lawmakers important to their industries.

But it was in part a Republican lobbying scandal -- GOP lobbyist Abramoff's defrauding of Indian tribal clients and the subsequent investigation into his efforts to influence lawmakers with lavish gifts -- that gave Democrats their opening to regain control of Congress. Democrats took over in January after a campaign that accused Republicans of fostering a "culture of corruption" in Washington and "selling access" to lawmakers. Abramoff has been convicted of fraud, tax evasion and conspiracy and is in federal prison.

Now, with the tables turned, Democrats are courting Abramoff's most famous clientele -- Indian tribes.

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee's upcoming fundraiser was planned to coincide with a meeting in Washington of the National Congress of American Indians. It is being hosted by a law firm that lobbies for tribal casinos and the National Indian Gaming Association's political action committee. [/hide]

The association represents more than 100 tribes with casinos or gambling operations, including those Abramoff was paid to represent. Last year, former Abramoff clients such as the Saginaw Chippewa, Agua Caliente and Mississippi Choctaw gave money to fund the PAC...
Democratic fundraisers said they were still trying to organize a second donor event that could involve a few of the tribes that were entangled with Abramoff...

Democrats reject any parallels to the Abramoff saga. "Abramoff was involved in a pervasive culture of corruption," said Matthew Miller, spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. "Native Americans have every right to participate in the political process just like Americans across the country do."

Government-watchdog groups are chagrined but not surprised by the rush of high-level Democratic fundraising. "Coming so close on the heels of winning last year's election based on changing the so-called culture of corruption in Washington, it's unseemly, but it's completely predictable," said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. "Democrats, like the Republicans before them, need the cash to maintain their majority status, and when you are in the majority it is much easier to collect the money."
First things first... I know the Republicans did it too. And I know that the article says that the Republicans are still trying to chase some high profile donors (unhide the text to get that part). However, I'm posting this because I'm shocked to see such a blatant display of the very behavior that the Dems and their partisans have lambasted the Republicans for over the last few years. I mean, come on - they're going after Abramoff's old clients!

Further, this bit:
Quote:
Originally Posted by WA PO article
Asked whether banking interests feel obligated to give to Democrats when he asks them for contributions, Frank answered: "Obligated? No. Incentivized? Yes." Frank said, however, that those donating "understand, and others do, too, that there are no guarantees of my doing what they want, or even my being pleasant."
This scares me. Either Frank is so stupid he believes this, or he thinks that we are so stupid that we'll believe it.

I've been quite fed up with the brazen disrespect the Republicans have shown the electorate for the last 4 years. This makes it look as though the Democrats have learned from their opponents a little too well...

EDIT: I guess I'm looking for someone (host?) to tell me how the Democrats aren't just more of the same. Why aren't there more people agitating for 3rd (4th, etc.) parties or true change from these two?
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam

Last edited by ubertuber; 02-24-2007 at 03:18 PM..
ubertuber is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360