Quote:
Originally Posted by Orange
Everyone has pretty much already summed up the answer you were looking for, but here's my two cents.
They are everywhere. They watch you when you sleep. They do not like Oranges... there is much wrong with this. But anyways, you will find that there are a lot of biased people out there who will not accept a different answer as correct. It does not matter if you are right, to them, it just simply isn't. I like to think they are just pathological liars in nature, and just can't help it.
But in order to realize that your debate is not an "arguement"... would be by using a credible source to back up your side of the discussion. If it falls into an opinionated arguement, just do not respond as it is a waste of time.
|
It's a scientific debate [insert geek joke] and there's plenty of literature being thrown around. The problem is that he's basing his thoughts on studies that are poorly done and biased. The thread started with his buddy but he's stepped in now. He's a hack and only quotes those studies that are given to him when attending a course. I'm showing him exactly why the studies he's quoting suck ass and showing him others, but it's no use.
I tried to diffuse the situation by posting DaveMatrix's picture. I'll see how he responds but the guy's from Texas. We all know what guys from Texas do with facts.....