Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
which is exactly why we find ourselves tearing at the seams today.
the constitution is NOT a living document. It is a legal document. It MUST be interpreted as such, ESPECIALLY considering that there is already a built in way to alter the constitution without judicial tyranny or social engineering.
At least Ron Paul is still trying to do the right thing. Too bad too many other wayward people don't believe that way.
|
How would it ever be altered, if it can only be interpreted as Ron Paul, and you, dksuddeth advocate that it has to be? I'm also assuming that you would advocate eliminating most....or all....of the amendments to the constitution, to "restore" it to "legality".
...and what of the amendments eliminating slavery and establishing women's suffrage, in your "non-living", legal document, view?